by Ross Nichols | Aug 23, 2024
Seemingly hurried to make a public statement following Clermont-Ganneau’s report published in The Times on 21 August, Dr. Ginsburg turned in a report to Mr. Bond on the next day. Like Clermont-Ganneau, Ginsburg also declared that the strips were forged. The...
by Ross Nichols | Aug 21, 2024
On Tuesday, 21 August 1883, readers of The Times would read the opinions of Monsieur Clermont-Ganneau and Claude Conder in regard to Mr. Shapira’s Manuscripts.[1] The following is a translation of a letter we have received from M. Clermont-Ganneau: “I...
by Ross Nichols | Aug 19, 2024
The 19th of August marks the 155th anniversary of an archaeological discovery that has fascinated the world of biblical studies due to its profound biblical connections. History, however, has its way of concealing truths in the most unsuspecting shadows. The esteemed...
by Ross Nichols | Aug 18, 2024
On Saturday, 18 August 1883, Monsieur Clermont-Ganneau completed his second of two days of what he called an “unpleasant task” of examining the two fragments of the MS displayed in the King’s Library. He wrote his assessment on this day, but it would not appear until...
by Ross Nichols | Aug 16, 2024
On Thursday, 16 August 1883, a reporter from the Liverpool Daily Post expressed, on behalf of the believers in the authenticity of the leather strips, that if the manuscript were a forgery, Dr. Ginsburg would have already declared them as such. The fact that he had...
